United States
About the product
The Promogran Matrix Family of collagen dressings have been shown to be effective through multiple Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), that have been systematically reviewed in meta-analysis.(1)(2)
Suggested Applications
Legal
1. Chowdhry S.A, et al. Use of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen dressings versus standard of care over multiple wound types: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2021. 2. Chen Y, Du P, Lv G. A meta-analysis examined the effect of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen dressing on the management of chronic skin wounds. Int Wound J. 2023;20(5):1544-1551. doi:10.1111/iwj.14009CHENET AL.1551 3. Snyder, R. et al. A Retrospective Study of Sequential Therapy with Advanced Wound Care Products versus Saline Gauze Dressings: Comparing Healing and Cost. Ostomy Wound Management. 2010; 56(11A):9–15. 4. Cullen B, et al. Early adoption of collagen/ORC therapies improves clinical outcome. Paper presented at: Wounds UK Harrogate, 2011. 5. Gottrup F, Cullen B, Karlsmark T, Bischoff-Mikkelsen M, Nisbet L, Gibson M. Randomized controlled trial on collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose/silver treatment. Wound Repair & Regeneration. 2013; 21:1-10. 6. Veves A, Sheehan P, Pham HT. A randomised controlled trial of Promogran (a collagen/ oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing) vs standard treatment in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Arch Surg. 2002; 137(7):822-827. 7. Vin, F., Teot, L. and Meaume, S. (2002) The healing properties of Promogran in venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care, 11, 335-341.Brand |
Brand
Promogran™ |
Surface Area (Imperial) |
Surface Area (Imperial)
4.3400 |
Surface Area (Metric) |
Surface Area (Metric)
28.0000 |